Prince Harry loses Daily Mail privacy case as judge dismisses all 97 claims
Prince Harry has lost his privacy case against Associated Newspapers, publisher of the Daily Mail: the judge dismissed all 97 allegations, including Elton John's.
No victory lap for the Duke of Sussex this time. Prince Harry has lost his case against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail, with High Court judge Matthew Nicklin rejecting all 97 allegations one by one — in a claim that grouped the prince with names like Elton John and actress Elizabeth Hurley.
What did the court decide in Prince Harry’s case?
The claimants accused the Daily Mail’s publisher of unlawful information gathering: phone tapping, intercepting voicemails and using impersonators to extract personal data. The judge called the allegations serious but was blunt — suspicion is not enough; the claimants had to prove the information behind the stories was obtained unlawfully. None of the 97 allegations cleared that bar, and every one of them fell.
How much did the legal battle cost?
British media put the combined legal bill at around £40–50 million, making this one of the most expensive privacy cases the UK has ever seen. For Harry, who has turned his fight with the tabloids into a personal crusade — and who had previously extracted wins and settlements from other newspaper groups — it is his heaviest defeat yet. The full ruling is available through the official UK judiciary channels.
Britain’s celebrity pages have had no rest lately: the same week London was arguing about phone taps, the other side of the Atlantic was still buzzing over Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce’s wedding.
For the tabloids, the court’s message is clear. For Harry, so is the bill.
By Lucy Bennett
Image: Ministerie van Defensie / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)